Schematic plan · American Revolution

Battle of Cowpens

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveHorseHorseLeft wingRight wingReserveHorseHorseGuns0200 m400 mN

Great Britain (Br Army, 1,100 men under Tarleton) attacked USA (Am Army, 1,025 men under Morgan) in South Carolina. The CAA Database of Battles records 1 hours of fighting on a front of 0.2 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that USA held. Losses: Great Britain 929 (84%), USA 72 (7%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Tarleton

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry173
Great Britain centreInfantry230
Great Britain right wingInfantry173
Great Britain reserveInfantry144
Great Britain cavalry of the leftCavalry175
Great Britain cavalry of the rightCavalry175
Great Britain artillery (2 guns)Artillery30
TarletonCommander—
In this plan1,100

USA

Morgan

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry216
USA centreInfantry288
USA right wingInfantry216
USA reserveInfantry180
USA cavalry of the leftCavalry63
USA cavalry of the rightCavalry63
MorganCommander—
In this plan1,026

What the sources report

Great BritainUSA
Strength, this plan1,1001,025
Losses, this plan92972

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 92, “Cowpens”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
1 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Winter, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
0.2 km (attacker), 0.2 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker1,1009293502Frontal attack; Repulse; Annihilated
USAdefender1,025721250Defensive/offensive plan; Double envelopment; Breakthrough; Pursued

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.