Schematic plan · Arab-Israeli War, 1973 (October War)

First Battle of Mount Hermon

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Bare groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreArmourLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourGuns02 km4 kmN

Syria (Syr 1st Armd Div, 12,500 men under Col Juhni) attacked Israel (Is 79th Armd Bde(+), 6,946 men under Col Or) in Syria. The CAA Database of Battles records 17.3 hours of fighting on a front of 7 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Israel held. Losses: Syria 500 (4%), Israel 250 (4%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Syria

Col Juhni

UnitArmMen
Syria left wingInfantry2,363
Syria centreInfantry3,150
Syria right wingInfantry2,363
Syria reserveInfantry1,969
Syria artillery (71 guns)Artillery1,065
Syria armour (318 tanks)Armour1,590
Col JuhniCommander—
In this plan12,500

Israel

Col Or

UnitArmMen
Israel left wingInfantry1,405
Israel centreInfantry1,874
Israel right wingInfantry1,405
Israel reserveInfantry1,171
Israel artillery (36 guns)Artillery540
Israel armour (110 tanks)Armour550
Col OrCommander—
In this plan6,945

What the sources report

SyriaIsrael
Strength, this plan12,5006,946
Losses, this plan500250

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 589, “Nafekh”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
17.3 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rugged, Bare
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
7 km (attacker), 7 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Syriaattacker12,500500071Frontal attack; Penetration; Repulse; Withdrew
Israeldefender6,946250036Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Penetration; Pursued

Attacker’s advantages momentum +1 · initiative +1 · surprise +2

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.