Schematic plan · Italo-Ethiopian War

Battle of Adwa

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveHorseHorseCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGuns02.5 km5 kmN

Ethiopia (Eth Army, 120,000 men under Menelik II) attacked Italy (It Army, 20,251 men under Baratieri) in Ethiopia. The CAA Database of Battles records 12 hours of fighting on a front of 7 km, a double envelopment against hasty defense, and that Ethiopia won. Losses: Ethiopia 17,000 (14%), Italy 9,678 (48%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Ethiopia

Menelik II

UnitArmMen
Ethiopia left wingInfantry24,569
Ethiopia centreInfantry32,758
Ethiopia right wingInfantry24,569
Ethiopia reserveInfantry20,474
Ethiopia cavalry of the leftCavalry8,500
Ethiopia cavalry of the rightCavalry8,500
Ethiopia artillery (42 guns)Artillery630
Menelik IICommander—
In this plan120,000

Italy

Baratieri

UnitArmMen
Italy left wingInfantry4,630
Italy centreInfantry6,173
Italy right wingInfantry4,630
Italy reserveInfantry3,858
Italy artillery (64 guns)Artillery960
BaratieriCommander—
In this plan20,251

What the sources report

EthiopiaItaly
Strength, this plan120,00020,251
Losses, this plan17,0009,678

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 235, “Adowa”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
12 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Winter, Tropical
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
7 km (attacker), 14 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Ethiopiaattacker120,00017,00017,00042Double envelopment; Breakthrough; Pursued
Italydefender20,2519,678064Defensive plan; Withdrew with heavy losses

Attacker’s advantages leadership +1 · logistics +1 · intelligence +1 · initiative +1 · surprise +2

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.