The Siamese–Vietnamese War of 1833–1834 (Thai: อานามสยามยุทธ (พ.ศ. 2376 – พ.ศ. 2377), Vietnamese: Chiến tranh Việt–Xiêm (1833–1834)), was a part of centuries-long conflict between Siam and Vietnam for suzerainty over Post-Angkor Cambodia. After the Siamese–Vietnamese conflict over Cambodia during 1811–1813, Cambodia shifted from being under Siamese domination to the period of Vietnamese influence. Though losing Cambodia, Siam had always entertained the idea of retaking Cambodia. In the early nineteenth century, both Siam and Vietnam were politically and militarily powerful in the region, with Laos and Cambodia sandwiched in the middle, shifting alliances and submissions between these two hegemons.
Instability in Southern Vietnam, namely the Lê Văn Khôi Rebellion at Saigon in 1833, allowed Siam to reassert its power over Cambodia. In November 1833, King Rama III of Siamese Rattanakosin Kingdom sent Siamese armies of 40,000 men under Chaophraya Bodindecha to attack Cambodia by land and 10,000 men under Chaophraya Phrakhlang Dit Bunnag to attack Hà Tiên by sea. Siam's goal was to install its sponsored candidates the Cambodian princes Ang Em and Ang Duong to the Cambodian throne against the pro-Vietnamese incumbent king Ang Chan and also to conquer Saigon, perhaps also to assist the Lê Văn Khôi rebels at Saigon. This Siamese invasion came as a surprise for Vietnam, who was occupied with the rebellion at Saigon. Emperor Minh Mạng of Vietnam's Nguyen dynasty had to rely on the forces, generals and commanders he had earlier mobilized against the rebels to defend Southern Vietnam from the Siamese in hurry.
After sweeping through Cambodia and Hà Tiên, the two Siamese commanders Bodindecha and Phrakhlang Dit Bunnag converged at Châu Đốc and proceeded downstream the Bassac River. In order to reach Saigon, the Siamese fleet had to cross from Bassac River to Mekong River at Vàm Nao canal or Thuận Cảng River, which was a choke point. Nguyễn Xuân and Trương Minh Giảng, who were fighting with the rebels at Saigon, were sent from Saigon to deal with the invading Siamese, leading to the climactic Battle of Vàm Nao in January 1834, during which the Vietnamese prevailed over the Siamese, who were utterly defeated and had to retreat back to Cambodia. After the victory at Vàm Nao, Nguyễn Xuân and Trương Minh Giảng pursued the retreating Siamese deep into Cambodia. During the Siamese retreat, the Cambodians, in anti-Siamese sentiments, arose, further inflicting damages and casualties onto the Siamese. By April 1834, the Siamese had all retreated, with Bodindecha retreating by land to Battambang and Phrakhlang by sea to Chanthaburi.
Vietnamese victory over the Siamese allowed Vietnam to put down the Lê Văn Khôi Rebellion and to annex Cambodia into its direct rule, establishing Trấn Tây Province over Cambodia, with Trương Minh Giảng as the Governor-General, both in 1835. Dissatisfactions of Vietnamese rule eventually drove the Cambodians to arise against Vietnam in 1840, during which Siam took advantage of by invading Cambodia in late 1840, leading to the Siamese–Vietnamese War of 1840–1842.
Even though the main Siam's interest was on the Cambodian front, Siam also sent armies through Laos to attack the Vietnamese-held Muang Phuan in the Northern Front, resulting in forced relocation of the Phuan people from Muang Phuan and Phuthai people from Laos to settle in Siam.
The Siamese–Vietnamese War of 1833–1834 (Thai: อานามสยามยุทธ (พ.ศ. 2376 – พ.ศ. 2377), Vietnamese: Chiến tranh Việt–Xiêm (1833–1834)), was a part of centuries-long conflict between Siam and Vietnam for suzerainty over Post-Angkor Cambodia. After the Siamese–Vietnamese conflict over Cambodia during 1811–1813, Cambodia shifted from being under Siamese domination to the period of Vietnamese influence. Though losing Cambodia, Siam had always entertained the idea of retaking Cambodia. In the early nineteenth century, both Siam and Vietnam were politically and militarily powerful in the region, with Laos and Cambodia sandwiched in the middle, shifting alliances and submissions between these two hegemons.
Instability in Southern Vietnam, namely the Lê Văn Khôi Rebellion at Saigon in 1833, allowed Siam to reassert its power over Cambodia. In November 1833, King Rama III of Siamese Rattanakosin Kingdom sent Siamese armies of 40,000 men under Chaophraya Bodindecha to attack Cambodia by land and 10,000 men under Chaophraya Phrakhlang Dit Bunnag to attack Hà Tiên by sea. Siam's goal was to install its sponsored candidates the Cambodian princes Ang Em and Ang Duong to the Cambodian throne against the pro-Vietnamese incumbent king Ang Chan and also to conquer Saigon, perhaps also to assist the Lê Văn Khôi rebels at Saigon. This Siamese invasion came as a surprise for Vietnam, who was occupied with the rebellion at Saigon. Emperor Minh Mạng of Vietnam's Nguyen dynasty had to rely on the forces, generals and commanders he had earlier mobilized against the rebels to defend Southern Vietnam from the Siamese in hurry.
After sweeping through Cambodia and Hà Tiên, the two Siamese commanders Bodindecha and Phrakhlang Dit Bunnag converged at Châu Đốc and proceeded downstream the Bassac River. In order to reach Saigon, the Siamese fleet had to cross from Bassac River to Mekong River at Vàm Nao canal or Thuận Cảng River, which was a choke point. Nguyễn Xuân and Trương Minh Giảng, who were fighting with the rebels at Saigon, were sent from Saigon to deal with the invading Siamese, leading to the climactic Battle of Vàm Nao in January 1834, during which the Vietnamese prevailed over the Siamese, who were utterly defeated and had to retreat back to Cambodia. After the victory at Vàm Nao, Nguyễn Xuân and Trương Minh Giảng pursued the retreating Siamese deep into Cambodia. During the Siamese retreat, the Cambodians, in anti-Siamese sentiments, arose, further inflicting damages and casualties onto the Siamese. By April 1834, the Siamese had all retreated, with Bodindecha retreating by land to Battambang and Phrakhlang by sea to Chanthaburi.
Vietnamese victory over the Siamese allowed Vietnam to put down the Lê Văn Khôi Rebellion and to annex Cambodia into its direct rule, establishing Trấn Tây Province over Cambodia, with Trương Minh Giảng as the Governor-General, both in 1835. Dissatisfactions of Vietnamese rule eventually drove the Cambodians to arise against Vietnam in 1840, during which Siam took advantage of by invading Cambodia in late 1840, leading to the Siamese–Vietnamese War of 1840–1842.
Even though the main Siam's interest was on the Cambodian front, Siam also sent armies through Laos to attack the Vietnamese-held Muang Phuan in the Northern Front, resulting in forced relocation of the Phuan people from Muang Phuan and Phuthai people from Laos to settle in Siam.
Background
Internal and Interstate conflicts in Cambodia, Siam and Vietnam
Since the eventual end of Khmer empire in the fifteenth century, post-Angkorian Cambodia had been more or less under aggression by neighboring Siamese Ayutthaya kingdom. In the seventeenth century, Vietnam, led by the Nguyen Lords of Đàng Trong, expanded to the south into Mekong delta of Cochinchina, which had been Cambodian territories, in the process known as Nam tiến. Nguyen Lords exerted influence over Cambodia, bringing them into conflicts with Siam who also sought to control Cambodia. Dynastic factional conflicts in Cambodia aggravated the issue as rival princely candidates usually sought supports from either Siam or Vietnam in their claims to Cambodian throne. In 1771, Siamese King Taksin of Thonburisent troops to invade Cambodia in efforts to overthrow pro-Vietnamese King Ang Ton of Cambodia and to install his pro-Siamese candidate Ang Non. Siamese invasion did not achieve goal as the Nguyen Lord Nguyễn Phúc Thuần sent Vietnamese forces to repel the Siamese from Cambodia in 1772. Tây Sơn uprising toppled the rule of the Nguyen Lord in Vietnam. With Vietnamese assistance dwindling, Ang Ton decided to reconcile with his rival Ang Non. Ang Ton abdicated in 1775 in favor of Ang Non, who became the new pro-Siamese king of Cambodia. Ang Ton soon died in 1777. Another turn of event occurred in 1778 when Chauvea Tolaha Mou, the Cambodian Prime Minister, rebelled against Ang Non with support from the Nguyen Lord NguyễnPhúc Ánh, who was fighting the Tây Sơn at the same time. Nguyễn Phúc Ánh sent Vietnamese forces to defeat and kill Ang Non in 1779. Tolaha Mou installed Ang Eng the seven-year-old son of Ang Ton as his puppet king. Taksin was enraged as his pro-Siamese candidate was murdered by the pro-Vietnamese faction. In late 1781, Taksin sent Siamese forces under Chaophraya Chakri into Cambodia. However, a rebellion happened at home in Thonburi, prompting Chakri to broker a peace with Nguyễn Phúc Ánh in order to return to pacify political upheaval in Thonburi in 1782. Chaophraya Chakri assumed power and ascended the throne as King Rama I of Rattanakosin Kingdom, founding the Chakri dynasty of Siam.
Nguyễn Phúc Ánh was ousted from his base at Saigon by the Tây Sơn in 1783. Defeated, Nguyễn Phúc Ánh took refuge in Bangkok where he was well-received by the Siamese court, partly due to the preceding peace negotiations in Cambodia in 1782. Also in 1783, Oknha Yumreach Baen, a pro-Siamese Cambodian nobleman, managed to seize power from Tolaha Mou but the ensuing chaos and upheaval in Cambodia obliged Yumreach Bean to take the young king Ang Eng to Bangkok to be under Siamese custody. King Rama I of Siam sent Siamese riparian fleet down the Mekong in 1784 in efforts to restore Nguyễn Phúc Ánh but was utterly defeated by Tây Sơn navy under Nguyễn Huệ in the Battle of Rạch Gầm-Xoài Mút. The Siamese king appointed Yumreach Baen as Chaophraya Aphaiphubet to be prospective head pro-Siamese minister in Cambodia, though Cambodia continued to be technically under Vietnamese domination. In 1787, Nguyễn Phúc Ánh left Bangkok to successfully reconquer Saigon in 1788 and to reclaim his polity from the Tây Sơn with French assistance. According to Thai chronicles, Nguyễn Phúc Ánh sent tributes to Bangkok during his stay in Saigon. In 1790, Aphaiphubet finally defeated the rival pro-Vietnamese faction and took control of Cambodia. In 1794, King Rama I allowed Ang Eng to return to Cambodia to assume personal rule but also carved northwestern Cambodia, including the srok of Battambang and Siemreap, for Aphaiphubet to govern separately under Siamese direct rule. King Ang Eng of Cambodia died prematurely in 1797 with all of his four sons: Ang Chan, Ang Snguon, Ang Em and Ang Duong, were considered by Siamese court to be too young to rule. Nguyễn Phúc Ánh eventually reclaimed and unified Vietnam, proclaiming himself Emperor Gia Long of the Nguyen dynasty in 1802.
Siamese–Vietnamese conflicts over Cambodia in 1812–1813
In 1806, Ang Chan the eldest son of Ang Eng, who had been held custody in Bangkok being a young Cambodian prince, was finally crowned as the new king of Cambodia by King Rama I and was allowed to return to Cambodia to rule. However, Ang Chan grew resented of Siamese influence over Cambodia and eventually became pro-Vietnamese. On his coronation, Ang Chan also received recognition state seal from Gia Long and reciprocated with friendly gesture. When Chaophraya Aphiphubet Baen, the Siam-appointed governor of Battambang, died in 1809, another pro-Siamese governor was appointed, upsetting Ang Chan who expected Northwestern Cambodia to be returned to him. Siam-appointed governors of Battambang would be thorn in the side for Ang Chan. Ang Chan did not attend the funeral of Siamese King Rama I in 1809 and sent his younger brothers Prince Ang Snguon and Prince Ang Em to Bangkok in his stead. The new Siamese king Rama II then made Prince Ang Snguon the Uprayorach (viceroy) and Prince Ang Em the Ouparach (deputy viceroy), without consulting Chan, thus making these two princes to form a new pro-Siamese faction in Cambodia. Also in 1809, the Burmese invaded Phuket and King Rama II asked for Ang Chan to contribute forces as vassal kingdoms were expected to provide military assistance. However, Ang Chan ignored this request. Two pro-Siamese Cambodian ministers, Chakrey Pen and Kralahom Muong, acted on their own to gather Cambodian forces to be sent to Siam without Ang Chan's consent. Ang Chan considered this action to be a sedition and executed these two officials. The Cambodian court became again polarized into Siamese and Vietnamese factions.
The pro-Siamese prince Ang Snguon eventually rebelled against his pro-Vietnamese brother Ang Chan in 1812. Ang Snguon left the Cambodian royal city of Oudong to gather his pro-Siamese supporters at Pursat. Ang Chan requested military aid from the Vietnamese. Nguyễn Văn Thoại was sent to bring Vietnamese fleet to take defensive position at Longvek against Siamese attacks. Siamese court, in turn, sent Chaophraya Yommaraj Noi to lead an army of 5,000 men into Cambodia in 1812 to support Ang Snguon. Panicked, King Ang Chan, escorted by Nguyễn Văn Thoại, fled from Oudong to take refuge at Saigon where he was accommodated by the Vietnamese. Princes Ang Em and Ang Duong, Chan's younger brothers, chose to join the Siamese side instead and went to join their brother Ang Snguon. Yommaraj Noi, the Siamese commander, took control but found himself unprepared for long-term occupation of Cambodia. Yommaraj Noi then destroyed and burnt down Cambodian cities of Oudong, Phnom Penh and returned to Bangkok with Cambodian princes Ang Snguon, Ang Em and Ang Duong. The Siamese also deported thousands of Cambodians to the Siam-occupied Northwestern Cambodia.
Both Siam and Vietnam avoided direct confrontations during the crisis of 1812–1813. Simultaneously as Siamese army was invading Cambodia, the Siamese court sent a mission to Gia Long at Huế in 1812, explaining that Siamese expedition into Cambodia was of good intention to restore peace while blaming Ang Chan for the troubles at the same time. Gia Long assumed friendly pretension but put the blame on Ang Snguon instead. Through his reign, Gia Long maintained amicable relations towards Siam but geopolitical dilemma would soon cause Siamese–Vietnamese relations to sour. Cambodia moved closer towards Vietnamese domination. Siam was hesitant to actively compete with Vietnam over Cambodia due to prospective Burmese threat was still looming. In 1813, Gia Long assigned Lê Văn Duyệt, who had just been appointed as the governor of Saigon in 1812, to lead the Vietnamese army of 13,000 men to escort Ang Chan back to Cambodia with Siamese representatives as witnesses. Upon seeing the wrecked ruins of his royal city burnt to the grounds by the Siamese, Ang Chan reportedly cried in tears. Lê Văn Duyệt oversaw military defenses in Cambodia, constructing a new royal citadel for Ang Chan at Phnom Penh called Banteay Keav and another citadel at Lvea Aem. Ang Chan chose to reside at Phnom Penh rather than Oudong owing to its riverside position being accessible to Vietnamese protection navy. Nguyễn Văn Thoại was appointed as bảo hộ or Protector of Cambodia – technically Vietnamese representative minister in Cambodia.
Cambodia under Vietnamese domination: 1813–1835
Lê Văn Duyệt (called Ong Ta Kun in Thai and Cambodian chronicles) was appointed as Tổng trấnGia Định Thành or governor of Saigon citadel in 1812, which acted as the viceroy of Cochinchina or Southern Vietnam and also had authorities over Cambodia. With appointment of Nguyễn Văn Thoại as bảo hộChân Lạp or Protector of Cambodia in 1814, Cambodia became Vietnamese protectorate. Lê Văn Duyệt also built a Vietnamese shrine for Emperor Gia Long at Chroy Changvar, the land opposite of Phnom Penh on the river. Twice a month, Cambodian king Ang Chan, along with his Cambodian officials, would dress in Vietnamese costumes and worship Nguyễn Hữu Cảnh (a Vietnamese commander who conquered Cambodia in 1700) at the shrine. In 1815, at suggestion of Nguyễn Văn Thoại, Ang Chan sent Cambodian forces led by Samdech Chauponhea Tey to attack Battambang and reclaim Northwestern Cambodia from Siam. Samdech Tey, however, was repelled by Ros, the pro-Siamese governor of Battambang who was a son of Aphaiphubet Baen. This incident led to another round of Siamese–Vietnamese diplomatic crisis as Bangkok accused Nguyễn Văn Thoại of instigating this attack. Samdech Tey became the scapegoat as Vietnam put the blame on his belligerent actions and put Samdech Tey under pretensive investigation to please Siam.
In 1819, Gia Long came up with the construction project of Vĩnh Tế canal that would connect Châu Đốc with Hà Tiên. Nguyễn Văn Thoại was put in charge of the project with dedicative participation from King Ang Chan of Cambodia. Both Khmer and Vietnamese people were conscripted to labor works. In 1820, workers arose against Vietnam led by a Cambodian Buddhist monk named Ke, who declared himself a Neak Sel or holy man to rebel against Vietnam. Neak Sel Ke rallied many Khmer followers, establishing himself at Ba Phnum. Ang Chan sent out forces to put down the rebellion, which were defeated. Lê Văn Duyệt sent Nguyễn Văn Trí to lead the Vietnamese forces to eventually defeat and kill Ke. Siam took construction of the Vĩnh Tế canal with great alarm as Siam suspected the canal would facilitate movement of Vietnamese fleets into the Gulf of Siam, directly threatening Bangkok. In response, King Rama II then ordered his son Prince Chetsadabodin to supervise the construction of the Phisuea Samut or Samut Prakarn Fort in 1822 in defense against possible Vietnamese seaborne incursion.