Schematic plan · American Revolution

Battle of Eutaw Springs

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveReserveGunsGuns0200 m400 mN

USA (Am Army, 2,200 men under Greene) attacked Great Britain (Br Army, 2,000 men under Stewart) in South Carolina. The CAA Database of Battles records 3.9 hours of fighting on a front of 0.4 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense and prepared defense, and that Great Britain held. Losses: USA 554 (25%), Great Britain 693 (35%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Greene

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry514
USA centreInfantry685
USA right wingInfantry514
USA reserveInfantry428
USA artillery (4 guns)Artillery60
GreeneCommander—
In this plan2,201

Great Britain

Stewart

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry462
Great Britain centreInfantry616
Great Britain right wingInfantry462
Great Britain reserveInfantry385
Great Britain artillery (5 guns)Artillery75
StewartCommander—
In this plan2,000

What the sources report

USAGreat Britain
Strength, this plan2,2002,000
Losses, this plan554693

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 95, “Eutaw Springs”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
3.9 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Flat, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense, Prepared defense
Front width
0.4 km (attacker), 0.4 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker2,20055404Frontal attack; Repulse; Withdrew
Great Britaindefender2,00069305Defensive plan

Attacker’s advantages intelligence +2 · surprise +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.