Schematic plan · American Revolution

Battle of Monmouth

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveReserveGunsGuns0500 m1 kmN

Great Britain (Br Army, 13,000 men under Clinton) attacked USA (Am Army, 11,000 men under Washington) in New Jersey. The CAA Database of Battles records 7 hours of fighting on a front of 1 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that neither side won. Losses: Great Britain 358 (3%), USA 362 (3%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Clinton

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry3,062
Great Britain centreInfantry4,083
Great Britain right wingInfantry3,062
Great Britain reserveInfantry2,552
Great Britain artillery (16 guns)Artillery240
ClintonCommander—
In this plan12,999

USA

Washington

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry2,590
USA centreInfantry3,453
USA right wingInfantry2,590
USA reserveInfantry2,158
USA artillery (14 guns)Artillery210
WashingtonCommander—
In this plan11,001

What the sources report

Great BritainUSA
Strength, this plan13,00011,000
Losses, this plan358362

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 90, “Monmouth Court House”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
7 hours
Winner
the draw
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Hot, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
1 km (attacker), 1.6 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker13,000358—16Frontal attack; Repulse; Withdrew
USAdefender11,000362—14Defensive plan

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.