Schematic plan · World War II

Battle of Arras

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingCentreReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveArmourArmourGunsCommand01 km2 kmN

Great Britain (Brit Rgt, 11,821 men under unrecorded commanders) attacked Germany (Ger Rgt, 18,000 men under unrecorded commanders) in Northwest Europe. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 5 km, a single envelopment against hasty defense, and that Germany held. Losses: Great Britain unknown, Germany 410 (2%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry2,703
Great Britain centreInfantry3,604
Great Britain right wingInfantry2,703
Great Britain reserveInfantry2,252
Great Britain artillery (8 guns)Artillery120
Great Britain armour (88 tanks)Armour440
Great Britain commandCommander—
In this plan11,822

Germany

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry4,058
Germany centreInfantry5,411
Germany right wingInfantry4,058
Germany reserveInfantry3,382
Germany armour (218 tanks)Armour1,090
Germany commandCommander—
In this plan17,999

What the sources report

Great BritainGermany
Strength, this plan11,82118,000
Losses, this planunknown410

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 659, “Arras”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Temperate, Spring, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
5 km (attacker), null km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker11,821—08Single envelopment; Repulse
Germanydefender18,0004100—Pursued

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle, and which flank the envelopment fell on is a guess. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.