Schematic plan · Arab-Israeli, 1948

Operation Yevusi

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingLeft wingRight wingReserveArmourGuns02 km4 kmN

Israel (Is Rgt, 3,000 men under unrecorded commanders) attacked Jordan (Jor Rgt, 3,600 men under unrecorded commanders) in West Bank. The CAA Database of Battles records 936 hours of fighting on a front of 10 km, a frontal attack against prepared defense, and that neither side won. Losses: Israel 375 (13%), Jordan 500 (14%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Israel

UnitArmMen
Israel left wingInfantry695
Israel centreInfantry926
Israel right wingInfantry695
Israel reserveInfantry579
Israel artillery (2 guns)Artillery30
Israel armour (15 tanks)Armour75
Israel commandCommander—
In this plan3,000

Jordan

UnitArmMen
Jordan left wingInfantry840
Jordan centreInfantry1,120
Jordan right wingInfantry840
Jordan reserveInfantry700
Jordan artillery (4 guns)Artillery60
Jordan armour (8 tanks)Armour40
Jordan commandCommander—
In this plan3,600

What the sources report

IsraelJordan
Strength, this plan3,0003,600
Losses, this plan375500

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 655, “Jerusalem (Jebussi)”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
936 hours
Winner
the draw
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Temperate, Spring, Desert
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
10 km (attacker), null km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Israelattacker3,00037502Frontal attack
Jordandefender3,60050004—

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.