Schematic plan · Korean War

Battle of the Imjin River

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
CentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGunsCommand05 km10 kmN

North Korea (Nkor Army, 30,700 men under unrecorded commanders) attacked USA (US Div, 26,900 men under unrecorded commanders) in Korea. The CAA Database of Battles records 96 hours of fighting on a front of 24 km, a frontal attack against delaying action, and that North Korea won. Losses: North Korea 5,730 (19%), USA 470 (2%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

North Korea

UnitArmMen
North Korea left wingInfantry6,504
North Korea centreInfantry8,672
North Korea right wingInfantry6,504
North Korea reserveInfantry5,420
North Korea artillery (240 guns)Artillery3,600
North Korea commandCommander—
In this plan30,700

USA

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry5,939
USA centreInfantry7,918
USA right wingInfantry5,939
USA reserveInfantry4,949
USA artillery (72 guns)Artillery1,080
USA armour (215 tanks)Armour1,075
USA commandCommander—
In this plan26,900

What the sources report

North KoreaUSA
Strength, this plan30,70026,900
Losses, this plan5,730470

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 634, “Kansas Line”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
96 hours
Winner
the attacker
Weather
Wet, Light precipitation, Temperate, Spring, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Delaying action
Front width
24 km (attacker), null km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
North Koreaattacker30,7005,7300240Penetration
USAdefender26,900470072Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.