Schematic plan · Arab-Israeli War, 1973 (October War)

Second Battle of Mount Hermon

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGunsArmourArmour0250 m500 mN

Israel (Is Golani Bde(-), 2,692 men under Col Drori) attacked Syria (Syr Para Bde(-), 1,583 men under unrecorded commanders) in Syria. The CAA Database of Battles records 12 hours of fighting on a front of 1 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that Syria held. Losses: Israel 50 (2%), Syria 100 (6%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Israel

Col Drori

UnitArmMen
Israel left wingInfantry592
Israel centreInfantry789
Israel right wingInfantry592
Israel reserveInfantry493
Israel artillery (12 guns)Artillery180
Israel armour (9 tanks)Armour45
Col DroriCommander—
In this plan2,691

Syria

UnitArmMen
Syria left wingInfantry317
Syria centreInfantry423
Syria right wingInfantry317
Syria reserveInfantry264
Syria artillery (24 guns)Artillery237
Syria armour (5 tanks)Armour25
Syria commandCommander—
In this plan1,583

What the sources report

IsraelSyria
Strength, this plan2,6921,583
Losses, this plan50100

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 593, “Mount Hermon I”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
12 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Hot, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
1 km (attacker), 1 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Israelattacker2,69250012Frontal attack; Repulse; Withdrew
Syriadefender1,583100024Defensive plan

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.