Schematic plan · Arab-Israeli War, 1973 (October War)

Battle of Adabiya

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Desert groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmourGuns02.5 km5 kmN

Israel (Is Magen Div, 10,900 men under Bg Magen) attacked Egypt (Eg 3rd Army(-), 14,620 men under Mg Wassel) in Egypt. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 13 km, a single envelopment, right rear against withdrawal, and that Israel won. Losses: Israel 75 (1%), Egypt 400 (3%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Israel

Bg Magen

UnitArmMen
Israel left wingInfantry2,290
Israel centreInfantry3,053
Israel right wingInfantry2,290
Israel reserveInfantry1,908
Israel artillery (36 guns)Artillery540
Israel armour (164 tanks)Armour820
Bg MagenCommander—
In this plan10,901

Egypt

Mg Wassel

UnitArmMen
Egypt left wingInfantry2,971
Egypt centreInfantry3,962
Egypt right wingInfantry2,971
Egypt reserveInfantry2,476
Egypt artillery (83 guns)Artillery1,245
Egypt armour (199 tanks)Armour995
Mg WasselCommander—
In this plan14,620

What the sources report

IsraelEgypt
Strength, this plan10,90014,620
Losses, this plan75400

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 584, “Adabiya”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Desert
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Hot, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Withdrawal
Front width
13 km (attacker), 13 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Israelattacker10,90075036Single envelopment; Right rear; Breakthrough
Egyptdefender14,620400083Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages leadership +1 · training +1 · morale +1 · momentum +1 · initiative +1 · air superiority +1 · combat effectiveness +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.