Schematic plan · Arab-Israeli War, 1973 (October War)

Battle of Jebel Geneifa

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Desert groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingGunsReserveArmourArmourGuns05 km10 kmN

Israel (Is Adan Div(+), 16,200 men under Mg Adan) attacked Egypt (Eg 3rd Army(-), 35,633 men under Mg Wassel) in Egypt. The CAA Database of Battles records 34 hours of fighting on a front of 18 km, a frontal attack, double envelopment against hasty defense and prepared defense, and that Israel won. Losses: Israel 300 (2%), Egypt 1,650 (5%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Israel

Mg Adan

UnitArmMen
Israel left wingInfantry3,334
Israel centreInfantry4,445
Israel right wingInfantry3,334
Israel reserveInfantry2,778
Israel artillery (48 guns)Artillery720
Israel armour (318 tanks)Armour1,590
Mg AdanCommander—
In this plan16,201

Egypt

Mg Wassel

UnitArmMen
Egypt left wingInfantry7,240
Egypt centreInfantry9,654
Egypt right wingInfantry7,240
Egypt reserveInfantry6,034
Egypt artillery (213 guns)Artillery3,195
Egypt armour (454 tanks)Armour2,270
Mg WasselCommander—
In this plan35,633

What the sources report

IsraelEgypt
Strength, this plan16,20035,633
Losses, this plan3001,650

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 580, “Jebel Geneifa”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
34 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Desert
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Hot, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense, Prepared defense
Front width
18 km (attacker), 18 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Israelattacker16,200300048Frontal attack; Double envelopment; Breakthrough
Egyptdefender35,6331,6500213Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages leadership +1 · training +1 · momentum +1 · initiative +1 · air superiority +1 · combat effectiveness +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.