Schematic plan · Arab-Israeli War, 1973 (October War)

Battle of Ismailia

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Desert groundCentreLeft wingRight wingCentreReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmourGunsSharon05 km10 kmN

Israel (Is Sharon Div, 17,000 men under Mg Sharon) attacked Egypt (Eg 2nd Army(-), 23,860 men under Mg Kalil) in Egypt. The CAA Database of Battles records 50 hours of fighting on a front of 20 km, a frontal attack, double envelopment against hasty defense and prepared defense, and that Egypt held. Losses: Israel 600 (4%), Egypt 1,800 (8%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Israel

Mg Sharon

UnitArmMen
Israel left wingInfantry3,542
Israel centreInfantry4,723
Israel right wingInfantry3,542
Israel reserveInfantry2,952
Israel artillery (72 guns)Artillery1,080
Israel armour (232 tanks)Armour1,160
Mg SharonCommander—
In this plan16,999

Egypt

Mg Kalil

UnitArmMen
Egypt left wingInfantry4,938
Egypt centreInfantry6,584
Egypt right wingInfantry4,938
Egypt reserveInfantry4,115
Egypt artillery (137 guns)Artillery2,055
Egypt armour (246 tanks)Armour1,230
Mg KalilCommander—
In this plan23,860

What the sources report

IsraelEgypt
Strength, this plan17,00023,860
Losses, this plan6001,800

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 579, “Ismailia”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
50 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Desert
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Hot, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense, Prepared defense
Front width
20 km (attacker), 20 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Israelattacker17,000600072Frontal attack; Double envelopment; Penetration; Repulse; Stalemate
Egyptdefender23,8601,8000137Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Penetration; Stalemate

Attacker’s advantages training +1 · air superiority +1 · combat effectiveness +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.