Schematic plan · Arab-Israeli War, 1967 (Six-Day War)

Battle of Kabatiya

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourGuns01 km2 kmN

Israel (Is Bar Kochva's Armd Bde(+), 12,800 men under Bg Peled) attacked Jordan (Jor 40th Armd Bde(-)(+), 9,900 men under Lcol El Khalidi) in Jordan. The CAA Database of Battles records 16 hours of fighting on a front of 1 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Israel won. Losses: Israel 375 (3%), Jordan 350 (4%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Israel

Bg Peled

UnitArmMen
Israel left wingInfantry2,731
Israel centreInfantry3,642
Israel right wingInfantry2,731
Israel reserveInfantry2,276
Israel artillery (48 guns)Artillery720
Israel armour (140 tanks)Armour700
Bg PeledCommander—
In this plan12,800

Jordan

Lcol El Khalidi

UnitArmMen
Jordan left wingInfantry2,146
Jordan centreInfantry2,861
Jordan right wingInfantry2,146
Jordan reserveInfantry1,788
Jordan artillery (24 guns)Artillery360
Jordan armour (120 tanks)Armour600
Lcol El KhalidiCommander—
In this plan9,901

What the sources report

IsraelJordan
Strength, this plan12,8009,900
Losses, this plan375350

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 551, “Kabatiya”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
16 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Hot, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
1 km (attacker), 4.5 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Israelattacker12,800375048Frontal attack; Breakthrough; Withdrew
Jordandefender9,900350024Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages leadership +1 · training +1 · surprise +1 · air superiority +1 · combat effectiveness +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.