Schematic plan · World War II (Okinawa)

Attack on Shuri Line's Eastern Flank II

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveArmourGuns0500 m1 kmN

One of the 28 engagements of the Battle of Okinawa recorded in the CAA Database of Battles (number 16 in date order). USA (US 96th Div(+), 20,973 men under Mg Bradley) attacked Japan (Jap 24th Inf Div(-)(+), 4,757 men under Lg Amamiya) in Okinawa. The CAA Database of Battles records 96 hours of fighting on a front of 2.5 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that neither side won. Losses: USA 590 (3%), Japan 4,328 (91%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Mg Bradley

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry4,124
USA centreInfantry5,498
USA right wingInfantry4,124
USA reserveInfantry3,436
USA artillery (210 guns)Artillery3,146
USA armour (129 tanks)Armour645
Mg BradleyCommander—
In this plan20,973

Japan

Lg Amamiya

UnitArmMen
Japan left wingInfantry1,019
Japan centreInfantry1,359
Japan right wingInfantry1,019
Japan reserveInfantry849
Japan artillery (34 guns)Artillery510
Lg AmamiyaCommander—
In this plan4,756

What the sources report

USAJapan
Strength, this plan20,9734,757
Losses, this plan5904,328

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 544, “Attack On Shuri Line'S Eastern Flank Ii”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
96 hours
Winner
the draw
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Spring, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
2.5 km (attacker), 2.5 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker20,9735900210Frontal attack; Penetration; Stalemate
Japandefender4,7574,328034Defensive plan

Attacker’s advantages technology +1 · initiative +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.