Schematic plan · War of the Spanish Succession

Battle of Oudenarde

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveReserveHorseHorseHorseHorseGunsGuns02 km4 kmN

England and Holy Roman Empire (Allied Army, 80,000 men under Marlborough & Eugene) attacked France (Fr & Bav Army, 85,000 men under Vendome & Burgundy) in Spanish Netherlands. The CAA Database of Battles records 6 hours of fighting on a front of 6.4 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that England and Holy Roman Empire won. Losses: England and Holy Roman Empire 4,000 (5%), France 15,000 (18%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

England and Holy Roman Empire

Marlborough · Eugene

UnitArmMen
England left wingInfantry14,045
England centreInfantry18,726
England right wingInfantry14,045
England reserveInfantry11,704
England cavalry of the leftCavalry10,500
England cavalry of the rightCavalry10,500
England artillery (32 guns)Artillery480
Marlborough & EugeneCommander—
In this plan80,000

France

Vendome · Burgundy

UnitArmMen
France left wingInfantry15,420
France centreInfantry20,560
France right wingInfantry15,420
France reserveInfantry12,850
France cavalry of the leftCavalry10,000
France cavalry of the rightCavalry10,000
France artillery (50 guns)Artillery750
Vendome & BurgundyCommander—
In this plan85,000

What the sources report

EnglandFrance
Strength, this plan80,00085,000
Losses, this plan4,00015,000

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 52, “Oudenarde”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
6 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
6.4 km (attacker), 6 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
England & Holy Roman Empireattacker80,0004,00021,00032Frontal attack; Breakthrough; Pursued
Francedefender85,00015,00020,00050Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Withdrew with heavy losses

Attacker’s advantages leadership +2 · technology +1 · initiative +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.