Schematic plan · World War II (Eastern Front)

Vistula River, Crossing, Phase I

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmour02 km4 kmN

USSR (Sov 91st Rifle Corps, 12,700 men under Mg Volkov) attacked Germany (Ger 171st, 214th & 26th Inf Divs, 5,100 men under unrecorded commanders) in Poland. The CAA Database of Battles records 48 hours of fighting on a front of 10 km, a river crossing, frontal attack against prepared defense, and that USSR won. Losses: USSR 1,150 (9%), Germany 320 (6%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USSR

Mg Volkov

UnitArmMen
USSR left wingInfantry2,591
USSR centreInfantry3,454
USSR right wingInfantry2,591
USSR reserveInfantry2,159
USSR artillery (205 guns)Artillery1,905
Mg VolkovCommander—
In this plan12,700

Germany

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,026
Germany centreInfantry1,368
Germany right wingInfantry1,026
Germany reserveInfantry855
Germany artillery (78 guns)Artillery765
Germany armour (12 tanks)Armour60
Germany commandCommander—
In this plan5,100

What the sources report

USSRGermany
Strength, this plan12,7005,100
Losses, this plan1,150320

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 508, “Vistula River, Crossing, Phase I”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
48 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Flat, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
10 km (attacker), 10 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USSRattacker12,7001,1500205River crossing; Frontal attack; Penetration
Germanydefender5,100320078Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Double envelopment; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages morale +1 · momentum +1 · initiative +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.