Schematic plan · World War II (European Theater)

Operation Cobra

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmour02 km4 kmN

USA (US 7th Corps, 126,000 men under Mg Collins) attacked Germany (Ger 84th Corps(-) & 2nd Para Corps(-), 30,700 men under Lg Cholitz) in France. The CAA Database of Battles records 48 hours of fighting on a front of 11 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that USA won. Losses: USA 1,510 (1%), Germany 5,000 (16%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Mg Collins

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry26,609
USA centreInfantry35,478
USA right wingInfantry26,609
USA reserveInfantry22,174
USA artillery (792 guns)Artillery11,880
USA armour (650 tanks)Armour3,250
Mg CollinsCommander—
In this plan126,000

Germany

Lg Cholitz

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry6,188
Germany centreInfantry8,251
Germany right wingInfantry6,188
Germany reserveInfantry5,157
Germany artillery (318 guns)Artillery4,605
Germany armour (62 tanks)Armour310
Lg CholitzCommander—
In this plan30,699

What the sources report

USAGermany
Strength, this plan126,00030,700
Losses, this plan1,5105,000

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 460, “Operation Cobra”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
48 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
11 km (attacker), 11 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker126,0001,5100792Frontal attack; Breakthrough
Germanydefender30,7005,0000318Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages logistics +1 · initiative +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.