Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1944)

Battle of Tarto-Tiber

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmour02 km4 kmN

Great Britain (Br 1st Inf Div & 5th Inf Div(+), 38,011 men under Mg Penney) attacked Germany (Ger 4th Para Div, 10,855 men under Col Trettner) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 7 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that Great Britain won. Losses: Great Britain 572 (2%), Germany 850 (8%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Mg Penney

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry8,317
Great Britain centreInfantry11,090
Great Britain right wingInfantry8,317
Great Britain reserveInfantry6,931
Great Britain artillery (200 guns)Artillery3,000
Great Britain armour (71 tanks)Armour355
Mg PenneyCommander—
In this plan38,010

Germany

Col Trettner

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry2,214
Germany centreInfantry2,953
Germany right wingInfantry2,214
Germany reserveInfantry1,845
Germany artillery (125 guns)Artillery1,628
Col TrettnerCommander—
In this plan10,854

What the sources report

Great BritainGermany
Strength, this plan38,01110,855
Losses, this plan572850

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 456, “Tarto-Tiber”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Flat, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
7 km (attacker), 7 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker38,0115720200Frontal attack; Penetration
Germanydefender10,8558500125Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.