Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1944)

Battle of Terracina

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveArmourGunsArmour05 km10 kmN

USA (US 85th Inf Div(-)(+), 18,030 men under Mg Coulter) attacked Germany (Ger 94th Inf Div(-)(+), 6,653 men under Mg Steinmetz) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 32.5 hours of fighting on a front of 15 km, a frontal attack, single envelopment, left flank against hasty defense, and that USA won. Losses: USA 287 (2%), Germany 380 (6%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Mg Coulter

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry3,637
USA centreInfantry4,850
USA right wingInfantry3,637
USA reserveInfantry3,031
USA artillery (148 guns)Artillery2,220
USA armour (131 tanks)Armour655
Mg CoulterCommander—
In this plan18,030

Germany

Mg Steinmetz

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,422
Germany centreInfantry1,895
Germany right wingInfantry1,422
Germany reserveInfantry1,185
Germany artillery (40 guns)Artillery600
Germany armour (26 tanks)Armour130
Mg SteinmetzCommander—
In this plan6,654

What the sources report

USAGermany
Strength, this plan18,0306,653
Losses, this plan287380

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 441, “Terracina”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
32.5 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Spring, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
15 km (attacker), 15 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker18,0302870148Frontal attack; Single envelopment; Left flank; Penetration
Germanydefender6,653380040Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages momentum +1 · initiative +1 · air superiority +1 · combat effectiveness +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.