Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1944)

Battle of San Martino

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Bare groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmour01 km2 kmN

USA (US 85th Inf Div(+), 17,970 men under Mg Coulter) attacked Germany (Ger 94th Inf Div(-), 8,141 men under Mg Steinmetz) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 3.5 hours of fighting on a front of 5.5 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that USA won. Losses: USA 1,974 (11%), Germany 720 (9%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Mg Coulter

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry3,608
USA centreInfantry4,811
USA right wingInfantry3,608
USA reserveInfantry3,007
USA artillery (160 guns)Artillery2,400
USA armour (107 tanks)Armour535
Mg CoulterCommander—
In this plan17,969

Germany

Mg Steinmetz

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,655
Germany centreInfantry2,207
Germany right wingInfantry1,655
Germany reserveInfantry1,379
Germany artillery (76 guns)Artillery1,140
Germany armour (21 tanks)Armour105
Mg SteinmetzCommander—
In this plan8,141

What the sources report

USAGermany
Strength, this plan17,9708,141
Losses, this plan1,974720

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 435, “San Martino”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
3.5 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rugged, Bare
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Spring, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
5.5 km (attacker), 5.5 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker17,9701,9740160Frontal attack; Repulse; Penetration
Germanydefender8,141720076Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1 · surprise +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.