Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Carroceto

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingGunsArmourReserveArmourGraeser02 km4 kmN

Germany (Ger 3rd Pz Gr Div(+), 26,490 men under Lg Graeser) attacked Great Britain (Br 1st Inf Div, 4,515 men under Mg Penney) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 20 hours of fighting on a front of 8 km, a frontal attack against prepared defense, and that Great Britain held. Losses: Germany 341 (1%), Great Britain 369 (8%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Germany

Lg Graeser

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry5,434
Germany centreInfantry7,245
Germany right wingInfantry5,434
Germany reserveInfantry4,528
Germany artillery (221 guns)Artillery3,315
Germany armour (107 tanks)Armour535
Lg GraeserCommander—
In this plan26,491

Great Britain

Mg Penney

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry759
Great Britain centreInfantry1,011
Great Britain right wingInfantry759
Great Britain reserveInfantry632
Great Britain artillery (82 guns)Artillery677
Great Britain armour (139 tanks)Armour677
Mg PenneyCommander—
In this plan4,515

What the sources report

GermanyGreat Britain
Strength, this plan26,4904,515
Losses, this plan341369

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 427, “Carroceto”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
20 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Flat, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Cold, Winter, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
8 km (attacker), 8 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Germanyattacker26,4903410221Frontal attack; Penetration; Repulse; Stalemate
Great Britaindefender4,515369082Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Penetration; Stalemate

Attacker’s advantages training +1 · initiative +1 · combat effectiveness +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.