Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Aprilia I

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmour02 km4 kmN

Great Britain (Br 1st Inf Div, 19,350 men under Mg Penney) attacked Germany (Ger 3rd Pz Gr Div(1/2)(+), 6,750 men under Lg Graeser) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 7 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Great Britain won. Losses: Great Britain 1,158 (6%), Germany 130 (2%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Mg Penney

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry3,862
Great Britain centreInfantry5,150
Great Britain right wingInfantry3,862
Great Britain reserveInfantry3,219
Great Britain artillery (242 guns)Artillery2,903
Great Britain armour (71 tanks)Armour355
Mg PenneyCommander—
In this plan19,351

Germany

Lg Graeser

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,327
Germany centreInfantry1,770
Germany right wingInfantry1,327
Germany reserveInfantry1,106
Germany artillery (66 guns)Artillery990
Germany armour (46 tanks)Armour230
Lg GraeserCommander—
In this plan6,750

What the sources report

Great BritainGermany
Strength, this plan19,3506,750
Losses, this plan1,158130

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 423, “Aprilia I”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Flat, Mixed
Weather
Wet, Heavy precipitation, Temperate, Winter, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
7 km (attacker), 7 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker19,3501,1580242Frontal attack; Penetration
Germanydefender6,750130066Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1 · surprise +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.