Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Monte Camino III

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmour0500 m1 kmN

Great Britain (Br 56th Inf Div, 20,744 men under Mg Templer) attacked Germany (Ger 15th Pz Gr Div(1/4), 3,288 men under Mg Rodt) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 84 hours of fighting on a front of 2 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that Great Britain won. Losses: Great Britain 550 (3%), Germany 141 (4%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Mg Templer

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry4,475
Great Britain centreInfantry5,966
Great Britain right wingInfantry4,475
Great Britain reserveInfantry3,729
Great Britain artillery (140 guns)Artillery2,100
Mg TemplerCommander—
In this plan20,745

Germany

Mg Rodt

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry656
Germany centreInfantry875
Germany right wingInfantry656
Germany reserveInfantry547
Germany artillery (34 guns)Artillery493
Germany armour (12 tanks)Armour60
Mg RodtCommander—
In this plan3,287

What the sources report

Great BritainGermany
Strength, this plan20,7443,288
Losses, this plan550141

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 421, “Monte Camino Iii”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
84 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Wet, Light precipitation, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
2 km (attacker), 2 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker20,7445500140Frontal attack; Penetration
Germanydefender3,288141034Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Penetration; Repulse; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.