Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Calabritto

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreGunsLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmour0500 m1 kmN

Great Britain (Br 46th Inf Div(+), 17,765 men under Mg Hawkesworth) attacked Germany (Ger 15th Pz Gr Div(-)(+), 7,588 men under Mg Rodt) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 23.5 hours of fighting on a front of 2 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that Germany held. Losses: Great Britain 250 (1%), Germany 20 (0%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Mg Hawkesworth

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry3,734
Great Britain centreInfantry4,979
Great Britain right wingInfantry3,734
Great Britain reserveInfantry3,112
Great Britain artillery (130 guns)Artillery1,950
Great Britain armour (51 tanks)Armour255
Mg HawkesworthCommander—
In this plan17,764

Germany

Mg Rodt

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,674
Germany centreInfantry2,231
Germany right wingInfantry1,674
Germany reserveInfantry1,395
Germany artillery (37 guns)Artillery555
Germany armour (12 tanks)Armour60
Mg RodtCommander—
In this plan7,589

What the sources report

Great BritainGermany
Strength, this plan17,7657,588
Losses, this plan25020

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 420, “Calabritto”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
23.5 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Wet, Light precipitation, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
2 km (attacker), 2 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker17,7652500130Frontal attack; Penetration; Stalemate
Germanydefender7,58820037Defensive plan

Attacker’s advantages air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.