Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Santa Maria Oliveto

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreGunsLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmour01 km2 kmN

USA (US 34th Inf Div(+), 16,870 men under Mg Ryder) attacked Germany (Ger 3rd Pz Gr Div(-)(+), 6,321 men under Mg Baade) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 4.8 km, a frontal attack against prepared defense, and that USA won. Losses: USA 416 (2%), Germany 185 (3%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Mg Ryder

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry3,590
USA centreInfantry4,787
USA right wingInfantry3,590
USA reserveInfantry2,992
USA artillery (92 guns)Artillery1,380
USA armour (106 tanks)Armour530
Mg RyderCommander—
In this plan16,869

Germany

Mg Baade

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,333
Germany centreInfantry1,778
Germany right wingInfantry1,333
Germany reserveInfantry1,111
Germany artillery (41 guns)Artillery615
Germany armour (30 tanks)Armour150
Mg BaadeCommander—
In this plan6,320

What the sources report

USAGermany
Strength, this plan16,8706,321
Losses, this plan416185

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 414, “Santa Maria Oliveto”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
4.8 km (attacker), 4.8 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker16,870416092Frontal attack; Penetration
Germanydefender6,321185041Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Penetration; Repulse; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.