Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Canal II

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmour02 km4 kmN

Great Britain (Br 46th Inf Div(+), 17,500 men under Mg Hawkesworth) attacked Germany (Ger 15th Pz Gr Div(1/2), 8,128 men under Mg Rodt) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 48 hours of fighting on a front of 9 km, a river crossing against prepared defense, and that Great Britain won. Losses: Great Britain 220 (1%), Germany 138 (2%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Mg Hawkesworth

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry3,534
Great Britain centreInfantry4,712
Great Britain right wingInfantry3,534
Great Britain reserveInfantry2,945
Great Britain artillery (168 guns)Artillery2,520
Great Britain armour (51 tanks)Armour255
Mg HawkesworthCommander—
In this plan17,500

Germany

Mg Rodt

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,742
Germany centreInfantry2,323
Germany right wingInfantry1,742
Germany reserveInfantry1,452
Germany artillery (45 guns)Artillery675
Germany armour (39 tanks)Armour195
Mg RodtCommander—
In this plan8,129

What the sources report

Great BritainGermany
Strength, this plan17,5008,128
Losses, this plan220138

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 412, “Canal Ii”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
48 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Wet, Light precipitation, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
9 km (attacker), 9 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker17,5002200168River crossing; Penetration
Germanydefender8,128138045Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.