Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Monte Acero

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingGunsReserveGunsArmourArmour02 km4 kmN

USA (US 45th Inf Div(+), 21,265 men under Mg Middleton) attacked Germany (Ger 3rd Pz Gr Div(-)(+), 6,435 men under Mg Luettwitz) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 8 km, a frontal attack, double envelopment against delaying action, and that USA won. Losses: USA 133 (1%), Germany 130 (2%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Mg Middleton

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry4,656
USA centreInfantry6,208
USA right wingInfantry4,656
USA reserveInfantry3,880
USA artillery (89 guns)Artillery1,335
USA armour (106 tanks)Armour530
Mg MiddletonCommander—
In this plan21,265

Germany

Mg Luettwitz

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,337
Germany centreInfantry1,782
Germany right wingInfantry1,337
Germany reserveInfantry1,114
Germany artillery (43 guns)Artillery645
Germany armour (44 tanks)Armour220
Mg LuettwitzCommander—
In this plan6,435

What the sources report

USAGermany
Strength, this plan21,2656,435
Losses, this plan133130

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 407, “Monte Acero”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Delaying action
Front width
8 km (attacker), 8 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker21,265133089Frontal attack; Double envelopment; Penetration
Germanydefender6,435130043Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.