Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Castel Volturno

13 October 1943
Italy
Victory for Great Britain

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.

Great Britain (Br 46th Inf Div(+), 17,765 men under Mg Hawkesworth) attacked Germany (Ger 15th Pz Gr Div(1/2), 8,158 men under Mg Rodt) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 9.6 km, a river crossing against prepared defense, and that Great Britain won. Losses: Great Britain 500 (3%), Germany 40 (0%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Mg Hawkesworth

Unit	Arm	Men
Great Britain left wing	Infantry	3,563
Great Britain centre	Infantry	4,750
Great Britain right wing	Infantry	3,563
Great Britain reserve	Infantry	2,969
Great Britain artillery (199 guns)	Artillery	2,665
Great Britain armour (51 tanks)	Armour	255
Mg Hawkesworth	Commander	—
In this plan		17,765

Germany

Mg Rodt

Unit	Arm	Men
Germany left wing	Infantry	1,749
Germany centre	Infantry	2,332
Germany right wing	Infantry	1,749
Germany reserve	Infantry	1,458
Germany artillery (45 guns)	Artillery	675
Germany armour (39 tanks)	Armour	195
Mg Rodt	Commander	—
In this plan		8,158

What the sources report

	Great Britain	Germany
Strength, this plan	17,765	8,158
Losses, this plan	500	40

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 406, “Castel Volturno”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting: 24 hours
Winner: the attacker
Terrain: Flat, Mixed
Weather: Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture: Prepared defense
Front width: 9.6 km (attacker), 9.6 km (defender)

Force	Strength	Losses	Horse	Guns	Plan and outcome
Great Britainattacker	17,765	500	0	199	River crossing; Penetration
Germanydefender	8,158	40	0	45	Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Repulse; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

US Army Concepts Analysis Agency; tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold, CAA Database of Battles (CDB90), no. 406 · ODC-BY-1.0Strengths, losses, front widths, hours of fighting, tactics and outcome.

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.