Schematic plan · World War II (Italy 1943-1944)

Battle of Capua

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsArmourArmour0500 m1 kmN

Great Britain (Br 56th Inf Div(+), 16,857 men under Bg Lyne) attacked Germany (Ger Hermann Goering Pz Div(-), 8,000 men under Mg Schmaltz) in Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 12 hours of fighting on a front of 2 km, a river crossing against prepared defense, and that Germany held. Losses: Great Britain 420 (2%), Germany 94 (1%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Bg Lyne

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry3,382
Great Britain centreInfantry4,509
Great Britain right wingInfantry3,382
Great Britain reserveInfantry2,818
Great Britain artillery (160 guns)Artillery2,400
Great Britain armour (73 tanks)Armour365
Bg LyneCommander—
In this plan16,856

Germany

Mg Schmaltz

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry1,681
Germany centreInfantry2,242
Germany right wingInfantry1,681
Germany reserveInfantry1,401
Germany artillery (59 guns)Artillery885
Germany armour (22 tanks)Armour110
Mg SchmaltzCommander—
In this plan8,000

What the sources report

Great BritainGermany
Strength, this plan16,8578,000
Losses, this plan42094

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 405, “Capua”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
12 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Flat, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
2 km (attacker), 2 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker16,8574200160River crossing; Repulse
Germanydefender8,00094059Defensive plan

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1 · air superiority +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.