Schematic plan · World War I

Fifth Battle of the Isonzo

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingReserve010 km20 kmN

Italy (It 2nd & 3rd Armies, 300,000 men under Gen Cadorna) attacked Austria (Aus 5th Army, 160,000 men under Gen Borojevic) in Austria. The CAA Database of Battles records 96 hours of fighting on a front of 48 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that Austria held. Losses: Italy 3,800 (1%), Austria 1,985 (1%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Italy

Gen Cadorna

UnitArmMen
Italy left wingInfantry72,000
Italy centreInfantry96,000
Italy right wingInfantry72,000
Italy reserveInfantry60,000
Gen CadornaCommander—
In this plan300,000

Austria

Gen Borojevic

UnitArmMen
Austria left wingInfantry38,400
Austria centreInfantry51,200
Austria right wingInfantry38,400
Austria reserveInfantry32,000
Gen BorojevicCommander—
In this plan160,000

What the sources report

ItalyAustria
Strength, this plan300,000160,000
Losses, this plan3,8001,985

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 312, “Fifth Isonzo”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
96 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Wet, Heavy precipitation, Cold, Spring, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
48 km (attacker), 48 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Italyattacker300,0003,8000—Frontal attack; Repulse; Stalemate
Austriadefender160,0001,9850—Defensive plan; Stalemate

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.