Schematic plan · World War I

Brusilov Offensive

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGuns010 km20 kmN

Russia (Russ Southwest Army Group, 600,000 men under Gen Brusilov) attacked Austria (Aus 2nd, 4th & 7th, & Sud Armies, 500,000 men under Gen Conrad) in Austrian Galicia. The CAA Database of Battles records 792 hours of fighting on a front of 400 km, a frontal attack against prepared defense, and that Russia won. Losses: Russia 495,000 (83%), Austria 260,000 (52%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Russia

Gen Brusilov

UnitArmMen
Russia left wingInfantry137,023
Russia centreInfantry182,698
Russia right wingInfantry137,023
Russia reserveInfantry114,186
Russia artillery (1,938 guns)Artillery29,070
Gen BrusilovCommander—
In this plan600,000

Austria

Gen Conrad

UnitArmMen
Austria left wingInfantry113,354
Austria centreInfantry151,139
Austria right wingInfantry113,354
Austria reserveInfantry94,462
Austria artillery (1,846 guns)Artillery27,690
Gen ConradCommander—
In this plan499,999

What the sources report

RussiaAustria
Strength, this plan600,000500,000
Losses, this plan495,000260,000

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 311, “1916 Brusilov Offensive”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
792 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
400 km (attacker), 400 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Russiaattacker600,000495,00001,938Frontal attack; Penetration; Stalemate
Austriadefender500,000260,00001,846Defensive plan; Withdrew with heavy losses

Attacker’s advantages logistics +1 · initiative +1 · surprise +2

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.