Schematic plan · World War I (Italian Front 1915)

First Battle of the Isonzo

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGuns05 km10 kmN

Italy (It 2nd & 3rd Armies, 200,000 men under Gen Cadorna) attacked Austria (Aus 5th Army, 100,000 men under Gen Borojevic) in Austria. The CAA Database of Battles records 336 hours of fighting on a front of 16 km, a frontal attack, river crossing against fortified defense, and that Austria held. Losses: Italy 14,947 (7%), Austria 9,958 (10%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Italy

Gen Cadorna

UnitArmMen
Italy left wingInfantry47,237
Italy centreInfantry62,982
Italy right wingInfantry47,237
Italy reserveInfantry39,364
Italy artillery (212 guns)Artillery3,180
Gen CadornaCommander—
In this plan200,000

Austria

Gen Borojevic

UnitArmMen
Austria left wingInfantry24,000
Austria centreInfantry32,000
Austria right wingInfantry24,000
Austria reserveInfantry20,000
Gen BorojevicCommander—
In this plan100,000

What the sources report

ItalyAustria
Strength, this plan200,000100,000
Losses, this plan14,9479,958

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 296, “First Isonzo”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
336 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
16 km (attacker), 16 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Italyattacker200,00014,9470212Frontal attack; River crossing; Repulse; Stalemate
Austriadefender100,0009,9580—Defensive plan; Stalemate

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.