Schematic plan · World War I

First Battle of Champagne

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGuns05 km10 kmN

France (Fr 4th Army, 163,182 men under Gen Langle de Cary) attacked Germany (Ger 3rd Army, 85,220 men under Gen Hausen) in France. The CAA Database of Battles records 696 hours of fighting on a front of 17 km, a frontal attack against fortified defense, and that Germany held. Losses: France 42,820 (26%), Germany 23,050 (27%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

France

Gen Langle de Cary

UnitArmMen
France left wingInfantry35,999
France centreInfantry47,999
France right wingInfantry35,999
France reserveInfantry29,999
France artillery (879 guns)Artillery13,185
Gen Langle de CaryCommander—
In this plan163,181

Germany

Gen Hausen

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry18,761
Germany centreInfantry25,014
Germany right wingInfantry18,761
Germany reserveInfantry15,634
Germany artillery (470 guns)Artillery7,050
Gen HausenCommander—
In this plan85,220

What the sources report

FranceGermany
Strength, this plan163,18285,220
Losses, this plan42,82023,050

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 289, “Eastern Champagne”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
696 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Flat, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Winter, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Fortified defense
Front width
17 km (attacker), 17 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Franceattacker163,18242,8200879Frontal attack; Repulse; Stalemate
Germanydefender85,22023,0500470Defensive plan; Stalemate

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.