Schematic plan · World War I (Eastern Front 1914)

Battle of Gnila Lipa

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGuns010 km20 kmN

Austria (Aus 3rd Army(+), 240,000 men under Gen Bruderman) attacked Russia (Rus 3rd & 8th Armies, 480,000 men under Gen Ivanov) in Austrian Galicia. The CAA Database of Battles records 96 hours of fighting on a front of 150 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Russia held. Losses: Austria 76,000 (32%), Russia 35,000 (7%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Austria

Gen Bruderman

UnitArmMen
Austria left wingInfantry54,619
Austria centreInfantry72,826
Austria right wingInfantry54,619
Austria reserveInfantry45,516
Austria artillery (828 guns)Artillery12,420
Gen BrudermanCommander—
In this plan240,000

Russia

Gen Ivanov

UnitArmMen
Russia left wingInfantry110,506
Russia centreInfantry147,341
Russia right wingInfantry110,506
Russia reserveInfantry92,088
Russia artillery (1,304 guns)Artillery19,560
Gen IvanovCommander—
In this plan480,001

What the sources report

AustriaRussia
Strength, this plan240,000480,000
Losses, this plan76,00035,000

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 284, “Gnila Lipa”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
96 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
150 km (attacker), 150 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Austriaattacker240,00076,0000828Frontal attack; Withdrew
Russiadefender480,00035,00001,304Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Penetration

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.