Schematic plan · World War I (Western Front 1914)

Battle of Charleroi

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingReserve010 km20 kmN

Germany (Ger 2nd & 3rd Armies, 440,000 men under Gen Buelow) attacked France (Fr 5th Army, 254,000 men under Gen Lanrezac) in Belgium. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 53 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Germany won. Losses: Germany 21,018 (5%), France 8,000 (3%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Germany

Gen Buelow

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry105,600
Germany centreInfantry140,800
Germany right wingInfantry105,600
Germany reserveInfantry88,000
Gen BuelowCommander—
In this plan440,000

France

Gen Lanrezac

UnitArmMen
France left wingInfantry60,960
France centreInfantry81,280
France right wingInfantry60,960
France reserveInfantry50,800
Gen LanrezacCommander—
In this plan254,000

What the sources report

GermanyFrance
Strength, this plan440,000254,000
Losses, this plan21,0188,000

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 265, “The Sambre”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
53 km (attacker), 53 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Germanyattacker440,00021,0180—Frontal attack; Penetration; Pursued
Francedefender254,0008,0000—Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Repulse; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.