Schematic plan · The Manchurian Incident (1938-1939)

Changkufeng-Shachaofeng

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Bare groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveReserveGunsGunsArmour01 km2 kmN

One of the 3 engagements of the Battle of Lake Khasan recorded in the CAA Database of Battles (number 1 in date order). Japan (Jap I/75th Inf Regt(+), 1,410 men under Col Sato) attacked USSR (Sov 59th Border Guard Unit(-), 1,460 men under Col Grebennik) in Manchuria. The CAA Database of Battles records 6 hours of fighting on a front of 3 km, a single envelopment, left flank, frontal attack against prepared defense, and that Japan won. Losses: Japan 178 (13%), USSR 350 (24%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Japan

Col Sato

UnitArmMen
Japan left wingInfantry288
Japan centreInfantry384
Japan right wingInfantry288
Japan reserveInfantry240
Japan artillery (14 guns)Artillery210
Col SatoCommander—
In this plan1,410

USSR

Col Grebennik

UnitArmMen
USSR left wingInfantry274
USSR centreInfantry365
USSR right wingInfantry274
USSR reserveInfantry228
USSR artillery (20 guns)Artillery219
USSR armour (20 tanks)Armour100
Col GrebennikCommander—
In this plan1,460

What the sources report

JapanUSSR
Strength, this plan1,4101,460
Losses, this plan178350

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 256, “Changkufeng-Shachaofeng”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
6 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rugged, Bare
Weather
Dry, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
3 km (attacker), 3 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Japanattacker1,410178014Single envelopment; Left flank; Frontal attack; Penetration
USSRdefender1,460350020Defensive/offensive plan; Repulse; Withdrew with heavy losses

Attacker’s advantages leadership +2 · initiative +1 · surprise +1 · combat effectiveness +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.