Schematic plan · Russo-Polish War (1920)

Battle of Warsaw (1920)

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Bare groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGunsArmour010 km20 kmN

Poland (Pol Army Group, 160,000 men under Pilsudski) attacked USSR (Sov Army Group, 200,000 men under Tukhachevski) in Poland. The CAA Database of Battles records 264 hours of fighting on a front of 335 km, a single envelopment, left flank, frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Poland won. Losses: Poland 50,000 (31%), USSR 150,000 (75%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Poland

Pilsudski

UnitArmMen
Poland left wingInfantry37,754
Poland centreInfantry50,339
Poland right wingInfantry37,754
Poland reserveInfantry31,462
Poland artillery (179 guns)Artillery2,685
Poland armour (1 tanks)Armour5
PilsudskiCommander—
In this plan159,999

USSR

Tukhachevski

UnitArmMen
USSR left wingInfantry45,847
USSR centreInfantry61,130
USSR right wingInfantry45,847
USSR reserveInfantry38,206
USSR artillery (598 guns)Artillery8,970
TukhachevskiCommander—
In this plan200,000

What the sources report

PolandUSSR
Strength, this plan160,000200,000
Losses, this plan50,000150,000

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 253, “Warsaw”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
264 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Flat, Bare
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
335 km (attacker), 335 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Polandattacker160,00050,0000179Single envelopment; Left flank; Frontal attack; Breakthrough; Pursued
USSRdefender200,000150,0000598Defensive plan; Withdrew with heavy losses

Attacker’s advantages leadership +1 · intelligence +1 · initiative +1 · surprise +3 · combat effectiveness +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.