Schematic plan · Russo-Japanese War

Battle of Sandepu

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Flat, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveGuns05 km10 kmN

Russia (Russ Army, 58,000 men under Grippenberg) attacked Japan (Jap Army Group, 40,000 men under Oyama) in Manchuria. The CAA Database of Battles records 24.3 hours of fighting on a front of 24 km, a frontal attack against prepared defense, and that Japan held. Losses: Russia 13,000 (22%), Japan 9,400 (24%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Russia

Grippenberg

UnitArmMen
Russia left wingInfantry12,660
Russia centreInfantry16,880
Russia right wingInfantry12,660
Russia reserveInfantry10,550
Russia artillery (350 guns)Artillery5,250
GrippenbergCommander—
In this plan58,000

Japan

Oyama

UnitArmMen
Japan left wingInfantry9,600
Japan centreInfantry12,800
Japan right wingInfantry9,600
Japan reserveInfantry8,000
OyamaCommander—
In this plan40,000

What the sources report

RussiaJapan
Strength, this plan58,00040,000
Losses, this plan13,0009,400

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 246, “Sandepu”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24.3 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Flat, Mixed
Weather
Wet, Light precipitation, Cold, Winter, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
24 km (attacker), 24 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Russiaattacker58,00013,000—350Frontal attack; Repulse; Stalemate
Japandefender40,0009,400——Defensive/offensive plan; Stalemate

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.