Schematic plan · Franco-Prussian War

Second Battle of Orléans (1870)

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingCentreReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveHorseHorseHorseHorseGunsGuns010 km20 kmN

Germany (Ger 2nd Army, 86,000 men under Friedrich Karl) attacked France (Fr Army of the Loire, 116,000 men under Aurelle) in France. The CAA Database of Battles records 48 hours of fighting on a front of 60 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Germany won. Losses: Germany 6,300 (7%), France 28,000 (24%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Germany

Friedrich Karl

UnitArmMen
Germany left wingInfantry15,436
Germany centreInfantry20,581
Germany right wingInfantry15,436
Germany reserveInfantry12,863
Germany cavalry of the leftCavalry7,400
Germany cavalry of the rightCavalry7,400
Germany artillery (459 guns)Artillery6,885
Friedrich KarlCommander—
In this plan86,001

France

Aurelle

UnitArmMen
France left wingInfantry22,445
France centreInfantry29,926
France right wingInfantry22,445
France reserveInfantry18,704
France cavalry of the leftCavalry8,000
France cavalry of the rightCavalry8,000
France artillery (432 guns)Artillery6,480
AurelleCommander—
In this plan116,000

What the sources report

GermanyFrance
Strength, this plan86,000116,000
Losses, this plan6,30028,000

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 227, “Orleans”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
48 hours
Winner
the attacker
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Wet, Heavy precipitation, Cold, Winter, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
60 km (attacker), 60 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Germanyattacker86,0006,30014,800459Frontal attack; Breakthrough; Pursued
Francedefender116,00028,00016,000432Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages training +2 · initiative +1 · combat effectiveness +2

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.