Schematic plan · American Civil War

Second Battle of Corinth

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveReserve01 km2 kmN

USA (US Army of the Mississippi, 22,000 men under Rosecrans) attacked Confederacy (Cs Army of Western Tennessee, 21,147 men under Van Dorn) in Mississippi. The CAA Database of Battles records 10.5 hours of fighting on a front of 4 km, a frontal attack, double envelopment against prepared defense, and that Confederacy held. Losses: USA 4,233 (19%), Confederacy 2,520 (12%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Rosecrans

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry5,280
USA centreInfantry7,040
USA right wingInfantry5,280
USA reserveInfantry4,400
RosecransCommander—
In this plan22,000

Confederacy

Van Dorn

UnitArmMen
Confederacy left wingInfantry5,075
Confederacy centreInfantry6,767
Confederacy right wingInfantry5,075
Confederacy reserveInfantry4,229
Van DornCommander—
In this plan21,146

What the sources report

USAConfederacy
Strength, this plan22,00021,147
Losses, this plan4,2332,520

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 192, “Corinth”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
10.5 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Autumn, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Prepared defense
Front width
4 km (attacker), 3.4 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker22,0004,233——Frontal attack; Double envelopment; Breakthrough; Pursued
Confederacydefender21,1472,520——Defensive plan; Withdrew

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.