Schematic plan · American Civil War

Battle of Savage's Station Battle of White Oak Swamp Battle of Glendale

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveReserve0500 m1 kmN

Confederacy (Cs Army of Northern Virginia, 86,748 men under Lee) attacked USA (US Army of the Potomac, 83,345 men under Sumner, Heintzelman & Porter) in Virginia. The CAA Database of Battles records 10 hours of fighting on a front of 3.2 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that USA held. Losses: Confederacy 4,241 (5%), USA 4,443 (5%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Confederacy

Lee

UnitArmMen
Confederacy left wingInfantry20,820
Confederacy centreInfantry27,759
Confederacy right wingInfantry20,820
Confederacy reserveInfantry17,350
LeeCommander—
In this plan86,749

USA

Sumner · Heintzelman · Porter

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry20,003
USA centreInfantry26,670
USA right wingInfantry20,003
USA reserveInfantry16,669
Sumner, Heintzelman & PorterCommander—
In this plan83,345

What the sources report

ConfederacyUSA
Strength, this plan86,74883,345
Losses, this plan4,2414,443

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 186, “Glendale-Frayser'S Farm”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
10 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
3.2 km (attacker), 3.2 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Confederacyattacker86,7484,241——Frontal attack; Repulse
USAdefender83,3454,443——Defensive plan

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.