Schematic plan · American Civil War

Battle of Gaines's Mill

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveLee01 km2 kmN

Confederacy (Cs Army of Northern Virginia, 57,018 men under Lee) attacked USA (US Army of the Potomac, 34,214 men under Porter) in Virginia. The CAA Database of Battles records 8 hours of fighting on a front of 3.6 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that USA held. Losses: Confederacy 8,751 (15%), USA 6,837 (20%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Confederacy

Lee

UnitArmMen
Confederacy left wingInfantry13,684
Confederacy centreInfantry18,246
Confederacy right wingInfantry13,684
Confederacy reserveInfantry11,404
LeeCommander—
In this plan57,018

USA

Porter

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry8,211
USA centreInfantry10,948
USA right wingInfantry8,211
USA reserveInfantry6,843
PorterCommander—
In this plan34,213

What the sources report

ConfederacyUSA
Strength, this plan57,01834,214
Losses, this plan8,7516,837

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 185, “Gaines'S Mill”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
8 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
3.6 km (attacker), 3.6 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Confederacyattacker57,0188,751——Frontal attack; Repulse
USAdefender34,2146,837——Defensive plan

Attacker’s advantages initiative +1

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.