Schematic plan · American Civil War

Battle of Cross Keys

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveCentreLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGuns0500 m1 kmN

USA (US Army of W. Va., 10,500 men under Fremont) attacked Confederacy (Cs Valley Army, 5,000 men under Ewell) in Virginia. The CAA Database of Battles records 3 hours of fighting on a front of 2.8 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Confederacy held. Losses: USA 684 (7%), Confederacy 288 (6%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

USA

Fremont

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry2,412
USA centreInfantry3,216
USA right wingInfantry2,412
USA reserveInfantry2,010
USA artillery (30 guns)Artillery450
FremontCommander—
In this plan10,500

Confederacy

Ewell

UnitArmMen
Confederacy left wingInfantry1,142
Confederacy centreInfantry1,523
Confederacy right wingInfantry1,142
Confederacy reserveInfantry952
Confederacy artillery (16 guns)Artillery240
EwellCommander—
In this plan4,999

What the sources report

USAConfederacy
Strength, this plan10,5005,000
Losses, this plan684288

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 181, “Cross Keys”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
3 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
2.8 km (attacker), 2.8 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
USAattacker10,500684—30Frontal attack; Repulse; Withdrew
Confederacydefender5,000288—16Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Penetration

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.