Schematic plan · American Civil War

Battle of Pea Ridge

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingCentreReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGuns01 km2 kmN

Confederacy (Cs Army, 16,202 men under Van Dorn) attacked USA (US Army of the Southwest, 10,500 men under Curtis) in Missouri. The CAA Database of Battles records 13 hours of fighting on a front of 6 km, a single envelopment, left rear against hasty defense, and that USA held. Losses: Confederacy 1,300 (8%), USA 1,384 (13%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Confederacy

Van Dorn

UnitArmMen
Confederacy left wingInfantry3,708
Confederacy centreInfantry4,945
Confederacy right wingInfantry3,708
Confederacy reserveInfantry3,090
Confederacy artillery (50 guns)Artillery750
Van DornCommander—
In this plan16,201

USA

Curtis

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry2,344
USA centreInfantry3,125
USA right wingInfantry2,344
USA reserveInfantry1,953
USA artillery (49 guns)Artillery735
CurtisCommander—
In this plan10,501

What the sources report

ConfederacyUSA
Strength, this plan16,20210,500
Losses, this plan1,3001,384

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 176, “Pea Ridge”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
13 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Spring, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
6 km (attacker), 4 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Confederacyattacker16,2021,300—50Single envelopment; Left rear; Repulse; Withdrew
USAdefender10,5001,384—49Defensive/offensive plan; Penetration

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.