Schematic plan · Austro-Italian War

Battle of Custoza (1866)

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreCentreLeft wingRight wingLeft wingRight wingReserveReserveHorseHorseGunsGuns02 km4 kmN

Italy (Ital Army, 90,000 men under La Marmora) attacked Austria (Aus Army, 75,000 men under Archduke Albert) in Venetia. The CAA Database of Battles records 9 hours of fighting on a front of 11.3 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that Austria held. Losses: Italy 8,100 (9%), Austria 5,600 (7%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Italy

La Marmora

UnitArmMen
Italy left wingInfantry19,229
Italy centreInfantry25,638
Italy right wingInfantry19,229
Italy reserveInfantry16,024
Italy cavalry of the leftCavalry3,500
Italy cavalry of the rightCavalry3,500
Italy artillery (192 guns)Artillery2,880
La MarmoraCommander—
In this plan90,000

Austria

Archduke Albert

UnitArmMen
Austria left wingInfantry17,381
Austria centreInfantry23,174
Austria right wingInfantry17,381
Austria reserveInfantry14,484
Austria artillery (172 guns)Artillery2,580
Archduke AlbertCommander—
In this plan75,000

What the sources report

ItalyAustria
Strength, this plan90,00075,000
Losses, this plan8,1005,600

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 170, “Custozza Ii”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
9 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Italyattacker90,0008,1007,000192Frontal attack; Repulse; Withdrew
Austriadefender75,0005,600—172Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.