Schematic plan · War of 1812

Battle of Chippawa

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rolling, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingCentreReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveHorseHorseGunsGuns0500 m1 kmN

Great Britain (Br Army, 2,100 men under Riall) attacked USA (US Army, 2,650 men under Brown) in Canada. The CAA Database of Battles records 1 hours of fighting on a front of 1.6 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense, and that USA held. Losses: Great Britain 604 (29%), USA 335 (13%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Great Britain

Riall

UnitArmMen
Great Britain left wingInfantry434
Great Britain centreInfantry579
Great Britain right wingInfantry434
Great Britain reserveInfantry362
Great Britain cavalry of the leftCavalry100
Great Britain cavalry of the rightCavalry100
Great Britain artillery (6 guns)Artillery90
RiallCommander—
In this plan2,099

USA

Brown

UnitArmMen
USA left wingInfantry622
USA centreInfantry829
USA right wingInfantry622
USA reserveInfantry518
USA artillery (4 guns)Artillery60
BrownCommander—
In this plan2,651

What the sources report

Great BritainUSA
Strength, this plan2,1002,650
Losses, this plan604335

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 147, “Chippewa”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
1 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rolling, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Sunny, Temperate, Summer, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense
Front width
1.6 km (attacker), 1.6 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Great Britainattacker2,1006042006Frontal attack; Repulse; Withdrew with heavy losses
USAdefender2,650335—4Defensive/offensive plan; Frontal attack; Double envelopment; Penetration

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.