Schematic plan · War of the First Coalition

Battle of Rivoli

A schematic plan, generated from the statistics of the CAA Database of Battles: the armies' size and width, the hours of fighting, the plan of attack and the outcome are as recorded; the ground and the positions are not.
Rugged, Mixed groundCentreLeft wingRight wingCentreReserveLeft wingRight wingReserveGunsGuns02 km4 kmN

Austria (Aus Army, 28,000 men under Alvintzi) attacked France (Fr Army of Italy, 20,500 men under Bonaparte) in North Italy. The CAA Database of Battles records 24 hours of fighting on a front of 6 km, a frontal attack against hasty defense and prepared defense, and that France held. Losses: Austria 14,000 (50%), France 5,000 (24%).

This plan is generated from those figures. It shows the shape of the battle the database describes: the size and width of the armies, the plan of attack and the outcome. It does not show where the units actually stood.

The armies

Austria

Alvintzi

UnitArmMen
Austria left wingInfantry6,594
Austria centreInfantry8,792
Austria right wingInfantry6,594
Austria reserveInfantry5,495
Austria artillery (35 guns)Artillery525
AlvintziCommander—
In this plan28,000

France

Bonaparte

UnitArmMen
France left wingInfantry4,848
France centreInfantry6,464
France right wingInfantry4,848
France reserveInfantry4,040
France artillery (20 guns)Artillery300
BonaparteCommander—
In this plan20,500

What the sources report

AustriaFrance
Strength, this plan28,00020,500
Losses, this plan14,0005,000

In the CAA Database of Battles

CDB90 no. 107, “Rivoli”, compiled for the US Army to study what decides battles. These are the figures a what-if engine can be calibrated against.

Fighting
24 hours
Winner
the defender
Terrain
Rugged, Mixed
Weather
Dry, Temperate, Winter, Temperate
Defender’s posture
Hasty defense, Prepared defense
Front width
6 km (attacker), 8 km (defender)
ForceStrengthLossesHorseGunsPlan and outcome
Austriaattacker28,00014,000—35Frontal attack; Withdrew
Francedefender20,5005,000—20Defensive/offensive plan; Pursued

Attacker’s advantages none recorded

CDB90 (US Army Concepts Analysis Agency, 1990), tidy edition by Jeffrey B. Arnold; data under ODC-BY 1.0.

Notes

On this reconstruction

Generated automatically from the statistics in CDB90. Frontages, depths, distances, the order of events and the terrain are schematic: they follow the recorded strengths, front widths, hours of fighting, tactical plan and outcome, not maps or accounts of the battle. The sources give no hours; the timing is conjectural.

Sources

Facts gathered from Wikidata (CC0), Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) and Wikimedia Commons (licence per file); the plan and its text are timeastra’s own.